Diversity Debate

$70,000 is a heck of a lot of money. $70,000 could go a long way. $70,000 could hire another teacher and reduce class sizes. $70,000 could cover the costs of building a MLWGS field house and bathroom/concession stand complex. $70,000 could buy another green school bus or equip a lab with new computers.

Unfortunately, this year, $70,000 is the amount of money that will be spent to conduct a highly controversial “diversity assessment” for MLWGS. For the next several months, four U.Va researchers will examine the fairness of MLWGS’ “recruitment, admissions, and retention process.”

A common sentiment among teachers, students, and parents is that that the best way to increase our school’s diversity is through recruiting efforts and gifted programs aimed at elementary and middle school students. No simple affirmative action solution could every fully succeed.

Another aspect of the study deals with the level of diversity among MLWGS faculty. Some in Richmond, such as mayoral candidate Lawrence Williams, believe that teacher diversity should be proportional to the community’s demographics and “reflect all complexions.” Mr. Williams’ opinion is both confining and self-limiting.

A more balanced viewpoint and applicable stance for MLWGS was voiced by Regional Board member Lisa Dawson, who offered her perspective on educational diversity in a recent Richmond Times Dispatch article.

“I don’t think the color of the teachers has one thing to do with it,” said Ms. Dawson.

So, if you happen to see one of the U.Va researchers in the next few weeks, be sure to say hello and share your voice. Spread the word that diversity at MLWGS cannot be achieved through rash decisions.